The day the world turned upside down

I am writing this post because we find ourselves in unprecedented times. While not directly associated with our journey at Dunblane, I need a platform to document my views on current events. Every action has consequences. When my grandchildren look back on these times, I want them to know where I stood on these matters. Decisions we make now are going to seriously impact the lives of these little people. People who implicitly trust us to do the right thing by them.

 in January 2020,the world turned upside down. I am going to try to put to paper the very strange events surrounding what is now referred to as Covid-19.

In late January 2020, the mainstream media exploded with news of an outbreak in China of a strange new virus.We read about how the Chinese Government put complete cities in total lockdown. They banned travel in and out of the city of Wuhan, where the virus originated, supposedly from a bat  colony The World Health Organization reassured us that there was no cause for alarm because this virus did not spread person to person. On the face of it, this was a contradiction. Why if this new virus was not spread person to person, was it necessary to put a whole city in lockdown  We then learnt that the whistle blower doctor who tried to warn the world about this Corona Virus was arrested and went missing. China, it appeared was hiding information.  As a member of the WHO, China has a duty of care to be open and transparent with other world health member countries. Why then did they deny scientists from other countries access to study the progress of this virus. The Chinese Government issued statements on death tolls. People, using social media, told a different story, saying it was much worse  than was being told. Then an outbreak occurred in northern Italy. Hospital admissions soared with very ill patients. ICU facilities were overwhelmed. Most people admitted to ICU died in respiratory failure. Terror spread through the world. International travel was suspended. One by one countries imposed "lock down" on their citizens. People were mandated to stay at home. The global economy ground to a halt.

On Dunblane we are pretty immune to the risks. Farmers live in social isolation anway. We get on with our daily chores and very often don't see any other people for weeks on end. So, on a day to day basis, this massive global shutdown has had no impact on our lives. It's normal for us to keep our pantry and deep freeze stocked. When this pandemic first hit, everybody rushed to the stores to "stock up".  Not so us. My point being, that while so many were filled with anxiety that they might either contract the virus or run out of food, we were totally relaxed. For us it was business as usual. We spend our days out in the sunshine, working the land. Not so our children. Some have had to close their businesses, thereby ending their income. Others are  forced to work from home, not sure of how long their jobs would last. All are fearful of the effects Covid19 might have on their children.

In 1985  we emigrated from South Africa and made Australia home. One of the things I found enchanting was the delightful Australian slang. One saying that springs to mind as I try to articulate my thoughts about Covid19 is "you wouldn't read about it". In South Africa, and presumably other English speaking countries, that doesn't really make much sense. To an Aussie it makes all the sense in the world. 

Here we are in May, 2020. We have just survived three years of crippling drought, then the devastating bush fires and now a viral pandemic. The big concern is the need to stop the rapid person to person spread globally. All but essential businesses are closed as are schools. Families are required to remain at home. If for some reason we need  to interact in society, there are strict guidelines known as "social distancing" Thereby avoiding physical contact.  Attention is paid to sanitising all surfaces, washing our hands, wearing face masks and rubber gloves.

Daily we receive TV and radio updates. Computers generate models predicting the outcome. Data is tracked and transcribed onto graphs which accompany the TV broadcasts. This is a new virus that has its origins in the Chinese city of Wuhan. For that reason, there is no "herd immunity" so the spread is rapid and the clinical presentation is very severe. Those who experience the full impact of this Covid19 illness, if left unchecked, are very ill indeed. The natural progression leads to organ failure. Emergency services can be overwhelmed. Many Covid19 sufferers end up in ICU needing assisted respiration. Sadly most die. This Covid19 is a very serious problem.

A dog is a dog because it’s a dog

We teach our children how to identify different things in the world by breaking them into parts. We have all sat with babies pointing to our ears, eyes, nose, toes and celebrating when they correctly identify these body parts. So too, a dog can be identified because it has 4 legs, a wagging tail, sharp teeth and barks. Over time we come to recognise a dog each time we see it. There is no need for the anatomy checklist. We know, a dog is dog because its a dog.

Its early August of the year the world turned upside down. Much more is known about the Corona Virus. We have learnt that it is less  deadly than the seasonal flu. We have learnt from the vast numbers of people tested, that those who have tested positive represent only about 15% of those who actually carry the virus. We have learnt that most people who contract the virus remain symptom free and make a full recovery. We have learnt that children and adults up to the age of 40 are at very low risk of mortality. Most have no symptoms. Others have mild flu like symptoms. Our son Alistair and his wife Jenny, who live in South Africa, have tested positive to this virus. They are both in their early 40's.  They as a family are isolating at home. For the most part they are in good form. What else do we know about Covid-19? We know that there is a group of high risk people, namely the elderly ( especially those congregated in aged care facilities ) and anyone, regardless of age, with a co-morbidity, like diabetes, heart disease and obesity. To these people, Covid-19, if left untreated, is a death sentence. We also know that the drug hydroxychloroquie in conjunction with zinc and an antibiotic erythromycin is a very effective cocktail which cures this Covid-19 illness. We also know that hydroxychloroquie is effective as a prophylactic against this virus.

Authorities, so called expeats, insist we all wear face masks. I can't find one reputable scientific article that supports this. The literature is full of research articles stating the opposite.

Majority of Scientific Studies Show Masks are Virtually Useless

Prior to mask mandates, surgical masks were infrequently worn in hospitals and other medical facilities. Facemasks were mainly only used in operating rooms or for visiting seriously ill patients in order to prevent spit or droplets into open wounds and to partially protect against serious diseases which are much larger in size than coronavirus or influenza. 

Below is a list of the gold-standard research which spans across decades, covering almost 100 different studies, all concluding the inefficacy of masks in preventing the spread of respiratory illnesses. 

Jacobs, J. L. et al. (2009) “Use of surgical face masks to reduce the incidence of the common cold among health care workers in Japan: A randomized controlled trial,” American Journal of Infection Control, Volume 37, Issue 5, 417–419.

N95-masked healthcare workers (HCW) were significantly more likely to experience headaches. Face mask use in HCW was not demonstrated to provide benefit in terms of cold symptoms or getting colds.

Radonovich, L.J. et al. (2019) “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial,” JAMA. 2019; 322(9): 824–833.

“Among 2862 randomized participants, 2371 completed the study and accounted for 5180 HCW-seasons. … Among outpatient health care personnel, N95 respirators vs medical masks as worn by participants in this trial resulted in no significant difference in the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza.

Long, Y. et al. (2020) “Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks against influenza: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” J Evid Based Med. 2020; 1–9.

“A total of six RCTs involving 9,171 participants were included. There were no statistically significant differences in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza, laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral infections, laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, and influenza-like illness using N95 respirators and surgical masks. Meta-analysis indicated a protective effect of N95 respirators against laboratory-confirmed bacterial colonization (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.43-0.78). The use of N95 respirators compared with surgical masks is not associated with a lower risk of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”

Cowling, B. et al. (2010) “Face masks to prevent transmission of influenza virus: A systematic review,” Epidemiology and Infection, 138(4), 449-456.

None of the studies reviewed showed a benefit from wearing a mask, in either HCW or community members in households (H). See summary Tables 1 and 2 therein.

Bin-Reza et al. (2012) “The use of masks and respirators to prevent transmission of influenza: a systematic review of the scientific evidence,” Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 6(4), 257–267.

There were 17 eligible studies. … None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator use and protection against influenza infection.”

Smith, J.D. et al. (2016) “Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks in protecting health care workers from acute respiratory infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” CMAJ Mar 2016

“We identified six clinical studies … . In the meta-analysis of the clinical studies, we found no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in associated risk of (a) laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, (b) influenza-like illness, or (c) reported work-place absenteeism.”

Offeddu, V. et al. (2017) “Effectiveness of Masks and Respirators Against Respiratory Infections in Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, Volume 65, Issue 11, 1 December 2017, pages 1934–1942,

“Self-reported assessment of clinical outcomes was prone to bias. Evidence of a protective effect of masks or respirators against verified respiratory infection (VRI) was not statistically significant.

Jefferson T, Del Mar CB, Dooley L, (2020) “A meta-analysis included 44 new RCTs and cluster-RCTs in this update, bringing the total number of randomized trials to 67.

This analysis concluded that there is low certainty evidence from all trials reviewed that wearing a mask may make little or no difference to the outcome of respiratory illness compared to not wearing a mask.

Lipp A, Edwards P (2005) “Disposable surgical face masks: a systematic review.”

“Two randomized controlled trials were included involving a total of 1453 patients. In a small trial there was a trend towards masks being associated with fewer infections, whereas in a large trial there was no difference in infection rates between the masked and unmasked group.”

Shakya KM, Noyes A, Kallin R, Peltier RE. (2017) “Evaluating the efficacy of cloth facemasks in reducing particulate matter exposure.”

“Our results suggest that cloth masks are only marginally beneficial in protecting individuals from particles<2.5 μm”

Coronavirus is 0.125 microns.

A recent study out of MIT for example concluded that when indoors while wearing a mask, there is no difference if you are six feet away from somebody or sixty feet away. The MIT researchers concluded that this is because the air you exhale is warm air, and warm air will rise. The researchers say this is especially true while wearing a mask, as masks force the exhaled air directly upward.

 

Hydroxychloroquine,  a drug used primarily for the prevention and treatment of malaria, a drug that has been used for 60 years, a drug that is both safe to use, is widely available and cheap. Why has this drug suddenly become difficult to access. In some places doctors are banned from prescribing it For Covid-19.  Studies conducted by reputable research institutions, have found this drug in combination with zinc and erythromycin has a 95%+ efficacy. Yet suddenly the WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION has stopped any further trials of this therapeutic regimen. The worlds leading medical journal, THE LANCET, recently printed a paper in support of hydroxychloroquine's lack of effectiveness for Covid-19. Medical practitioners rose up enmass to challenge this claim. It turns out it was fabricated lies and was withdrawn immediately. Why is there no outcry from the mainstream media whose only task it is is to convey the truth to the people. Why is it that the only voice practicing front line medical practitioners are given,  is an occasional TV clip or some digital platform? Why does the mainstream media not want us to hear what they have to say? 

What has this got to do with dogs?  I'm not an epidemiologist. I'm not a specialist virologist. I'm just someone who practiced medicine as a GP for the best part of 30 years. To me, there is something seriously wrong going on. I feel it in my bones. New graduates, like small children, when confronted with a diagnostic challenge, need to break it into its many parts before coming to a conclusion. For them a dog is a dog because it has a wagging tail, four legs a fur coat and it barks. To an old timer, a dog is dog because it's a dog. The old timer knows to then check for sharp teeth, fur coat, wagging tail and bark. The outcome is the same. Experience makes the process different.

As a primary care physician, with 30/something years of experience, I ask myself. " How is it that a virus, for which there is an effective treatment and is less deadly than the seasonal flu, can result in a global shutdown of the economy. Can force a whole population to wear masks that dont work and keep them locked up indoors. We now know that children are at low risk of developing a full blwn life threatening Covid-19 illness and have a very low risk of spreading it. Why then are they not in school? Especially when we also know that lockdown increases risk of social, behavioural and emotional problems for these children. Since the "lockdown" there has been a spike is domestic violence. Children forced to stay home in many cases prevent their parents from returning to work, thereby worsening  the family financial position.These stressors have many untoward consequences for the parents, the economy and the local communities.Chidren bear the brunt of this. Why then if children are not at risk from covid-19, do they not return to school. Doctors, nurses, police officers, supermarket sales assistants are considered " essential workers" but not teachers. Why? 

As I ponder these things, my conclusion is that there is something terribly wrong with this picture. I'm  no expert but I am capable of applying simple logic and common sense. Nothing adds up. It seems to me that there is something much bigger than a so called pandemic. Whatever  it is, if allowed to continue it will certainly destroy our economy and strip us of our civil liberties. I am aware that for decades there have been those who wish to undo our democratic system and Co-opt us into a socialist One World Government To do this the population must be compliant. Fear makes people compliant. As long as people believe that Corona Virus is a deadly pandemic and wearing masks and staying home is the only remedy, they will be compliant, while family businesses are destroyed and  the economy is ruined. I'm shocked that so few people take the time to fact check anything. Like sheep they blindly accept everything they are spoon fed. For anybody  willing to do some research for themselves,  and not rely on the media, will soon confirm there is no basis for this fear. We are being lied to!.........WHY?!?

As I see it, it's time to take off the gloves. Most people need to peel the scales from their eyes and wake up to the fact that evil people are trying to change our political system and take from us our God Given rights.

You cannot un-see what you have seen.

It is now July 2021, eighteen months since the emergence of the SARS COV2 viral pandemic. As I write Sydney is in lockdown because of the emergence of a Delta variant to this virus.

Much has been learnt about SARS COV2. Treatment, prevention, consequences of lockdowns and other social policies. Much has been learnt about the origins of SARS COV2, the people involved in its production, the deliberate cover up, the role of the media. We now know for certain that we have been lied to. To what end?

When I practiced medicine, debate was encouraged. Today anybody who dares to challenge the official narrative is labelled a "conspiracy theorist" I am immune to this labelling because in recent years so many of the so-called conspiracy theories have turned out to be true. Worse, any Doctors who fail to "tow the party line" are being disciplined.

https://www.covid19assembly.org/2021/07/whistleblowing-gps-letter-to-sir-simon-stevens/

I firmly believe, based on my extensive research into this Covid19 pandemic, that  we have been deliberately misinformed.

1. SARS COV2 is a novel virus for which there is no effective treatment.

This is simply untrue. Firstly, SARS COV2 is not novel.   The term "novel" means that it is new and therefore the general population has no herd immunity against it.  Recently it has been demonstrated that the virus cannot be "novel". Dr Bhakdi is a world renowned immunologist. Below is a very informative video explaining why.  In a link at the bottom of the page, Dr David Martin discusses the gene sequencing of the SARS COV2 virus being almost identical to SARS COV1, hence the recognition by the memory cells of the immune system. This suggests that natural immunity to this group of Corona viruses dates back many years. Dr Martin is confirming  Dr Bhakdi's point. (The second part of the Bhakdi video, while very relevant, discusses how the vaccine produces clotting.)
https://odysee.com/Dr.-Sucharit-Bhakdi-Oracle-Films-Message-HD:1aacd4172e60a8eb085a5ca5128afde918511771?src=embed

Secondly there is effective treatment against COVID19.  The Virology Journal ( The NIH official journal) on 22 August 2005, wrote “We report...that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage.” 

With experience, treating doctors have learnt that early therapeutic intervention when treating SARS COV2 is important.  Patients are successfully being treated as outpatients thereby preventing the hospitals from being overwhelmed.

Professor Richard Fleming and Professor Peter McCoullough were early adopters of outpatient treatment.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxmhvZ6eEI4

They established that antiviral drugs needed to be administered in combination, not in isolation. They developed the regimens and taught them to treating doctors worldwide. Dr Chetty, a general practitioner in rural South Africa has successfully treated 4000 Covid19 patients with 100% success.No deaths. No admissions to hospital. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTqmXOAU2mQ

When the authorities insisted that no effective medications were available, patients were left with "supportive treatment" only. The results were disasterous  People died who shouldn't have. Hospitals were overwhelmed that need not have been. The general population was put through hell. Relatives died alone. People were petrified of what might happen Next.  All because we were told a lie. Told by WHO and other "experts" whom we trust, that no effective treatment existed.

 

Some very disturbing associated facts.

Many treating doctors knew of the benefits of hydroxychloroquine.  Others learnt from researchers like Dr Fleming. They began prescribing these protocols and lots of patients recovered.  Out of nowhere the authorities started threatening these doctors if they prescribed these medicines. The official narrative was that there were no effective treatments. The solution was a vaccination. Medicines like Hydoxychloroquine and Ivermectin were withdrawn from circulation. The Lancet, the worlds premier medical journal, published a paper debunking Hydroxychloroquine. (This paper has since been retracted because it was shown to be fraudulent) Doctors were fired from hospitals or had their licence to practice medicine suspended when they ignored the " no effective treatment" directive. 
https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/videos/awaken/

 The big questions on my mind were:

1: Why would any government or health authority, whose only duty is to protect the community, insist that no effective therapies existed for SARS COV2 virus when they knew that was not true.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16115318/

2: Why would that government or health authority, deny the public access to safe, proven therapies? Especially during a pandemic. The Peter McCollough treatment protocols, clearly show early use of Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin. ( see below) 

3: Daily the mainstream media promoted and continues to promote vaccination as the "only treatment" Why, when it is not true.  It makes no sense, unless you listen to Dr Reiner Fuellmich. Dr Reiner Fuellmich, a lawyer who is preparing a class action law suit against the global promoters of the pandemic, believes they are intentionally committing a crime against humanity. He believes it's part of a One World Order eugenics program, designed to reduce the world's population.

I am stunned by people whom I consider to be intelligent. There is overwhelming evidence that the so called pandemic is no more problematic than the seasonal flu and 99% of people affected recover. For those who contract the virus there are very effective treatments. Despite these facts, a large portion of the population remains paralysed by fear. So much so that logical thought and discernment abandons them. They rush to be vaccinated with this experimental gene therapy which they know converts their cells into a " spike protein manufacturing machine". A therapy for which there exists no long term animal studies or indeed enough information provided to allow one to give an informed consent to the injection.  My own children fall into this category. I tried educating them by sending them various warnings. I sent them video clips made by very reputable scientists and front line practitioners warning  of the dangers. I was met by a stone wall of rejection. They refuse to discuss this with me. As far as I can make out, 4 of our six children have submitted to "the jab"  Freedom of choice is our basic human right, so I am not here to criticise thsir decision.They will be forced to bear the consequences.  I don't know how I will cope emotionally if any of them suffer an injury from this injection.  

It is such a long story, rather than write any more, I've decided to leave you some links made by some of these experts. By the time you read this, the truth will be out. Hopefully the perpetrators of this crime against humanity will have been brought to justice. At the end of WW2 the Nuremberg Trials condemned Nazis to death because of their horrendous crimes. The purpose at Nuremburg was to ensure that human experimentation without consent would never again occur.

Those who accept "the jab" are in effect participating in human experimentation. Many don't realise this, because they are not being told. we are being bombarded with vaccine vaccine vaccine. It's perfectly safe. I have just seen a short video of a medical doctor advising that a lawsuit has just been lodged against the Californian government. 45,000 deaths following the injection have been hidden from the public. The narrative is " the vaccine is safe"  Quite simply we have failed to learn from history and those who involve  themselves in human experimentation will pay the price. Earlier SAR COV1 vaccination trials were abandoned because while some of the study group suffered injury after both the first and second injection, the real problem occurred once "fully vaccinated" (in that case ferrets) were exposed to the virus " in the wild" By this is meant when they next were exposed to the next variant. The expectation was that they were immune. What happened was all the experimental animals died. This is such a painful truth knowing that my own children and many that I know and love have subjected themselves to this risk. Almost too difficult to contemplate. All I can do is pray that they will be spared. 

https://www.stopworldcontrol.com/fuellmich/

 https://www.algora.com/Algora_blog/2021/06/27/dr-peter-mccullough-whistleblowers-inside-cdc-claim-injections-have-already-killed-50000-americans

https://thehighwire.com/videos/live-from-event-2021-in-dallas-

https://odysee.com/@FwapUK:1/A-manufactured-illusion.-Dr-David-Martin-with-Reiner-Fuellmich-9_7_21_-720p:5

https://www.expandingawarenessrelations.com/doctor-peter-mccullough-full-interview-transcript/

 

Professor Peter McCollough Covid19 treatment protocols.
2011 newspaper that says in black and white that Bill Gates is going to start “depopulation through vaccination” as it will be “the most environmentally friendly solution”.

Write a new comment: (Click here)

SimpleSite.com
Characters left: 160
DONE Sending...
See all comments

| Reply

Latest comments

15.08 | 11:17

This is all brilliantly documented Paddy - am so totally inspired by how you have transformed Dunblane.

...
31.07 | 16:36

Hi Peter, exciting indeed. Suggest you contact a Rory O'Leary at BVSC. He is the economic development officer. Big focus on Eden Another farmersnet@fscla.org.au

...
31.07 | 12:48

Sounds exciting! I'd like to discuss how this might fit in with some other opportunities for the Port of Eden.

...
22.11 | 23:11

I read all the way through again. Well done, Paddy - super proud of you.

...
You liked this page